She walked into my office a few years ago, fresh MBA, ready to change the world.

Smart. Driven. Zero experience leading anything that mattered.

I gave her a supplier negotiation. €2.3M at stake. Strategic component. She’d never led a negotiation before.

She was terrified. I was betting on her.

Two weeks of prep. Role-playing scenarios. Reviewing strategy. Then I sent her in. Alone.

She called me halfway through. Panicking. Supplier was pushing back hard. She didn’t know what to do.

I said: “What do you think you should do?”

Long pause.

“I think I should… walk away. Come back tomorrow with better data.”

“Then do that.”

She did. Next day, she closed the deal. €340K better than target.

Today she runs procurement for a major European manufacturer, managing a team of 30 and leading negotiations at the highest level.

That’s the job: not managing tasks, but building people capable of surpassing you.

Why Most Managers Don’t Build Leaders

They’re stuck managing tasks.

Emails. Approvals. Status updates. Firefighting. The urgent drowning out the important.

Building leaders takes time. Tasks are immediate. Guess which wins?

The “task manager” trap:

You have two choices every day.

Option A: Do the work yourself. It’s faster. You know it’ll be done right. No risk.

Option B: Let someone else do it. They’ll be slower. They’ll make mistakes. You’ll have to fix things.

Option A always feels more efficient.

But Option A doesn’t scale. You become the bottleneck. Your team never grows. You’re stuck doing the same work forever.

Option B is investment. Short-term pain. Long-term leverage.

Most managers pick Option A. Then wonder why they’re overwhelmed and their team is dependent.

Why urgent crowds out important:

Leadership development is important. Never urgent.

That report? Urgent. Training your replacement? Important.

That meeting? Urgent. Coaching someone through a tough decision? Important.

That crisis? Urgent. Developing your successor? Important.

Urgent always wins. Until you realize you’ve spent five years managing tasks and built nothing that lasts.

The career cost:

To you: You don’t get promoted. Why would they promote you? Nobody can do your job if you leave. You’re too valuable where you are.

To your team: They don’t grow. They become order-takers. Execute tasks. Never learn to lead. Eventually they leave for opportunities to actually develop.

The leadership legacy ROI:

Think about the best manager you ever had.

What did they teach you? How did they develop you? What opportunities did they give you that changed your trajectory?

That’s legacy.

Not the projects you completed. Not the deals you closed. The people you built.

Your impact as a leader is measured by what happens after you leave the room. After you leave the company. After you’re gone.

Did you build leaders who build leaders?

That’s the only question that matters.

The 5-Phase Framework

Here’s how you actually do it.

Phase 1: Exposure (Months 1-6)

What it is:

Exposing high-potential people to leadership challenges before they’re “ready.”

Not giving them leadership roles. Giving them leadership exposure.

How it works:

Strategic project assignments that stretch them. Meeting shadowing where they see how decisions get made. Situations where they observe leadership in action.

Real example:

Junior analyst on my team. Brilliant with data. Zero executive presence.

I brought her to executive steering committee. Didn’t ask her to present. Asked her to observe.

After three meetings, I asked: “What did you notice about how decisions get made?”

She said: “The data doesn’t decide. The story around the data decides. Finance presented better numbers than us last week, but we won the decision because our narrative was clearer.”

Exactly.

She learned in three meetings what took me three years to figure out.

That’s exposure.

The Exposure Opportunity Matrix:

Opportunity TypeLow RiskMedium RiskHigh Risk
ObservationAttend executive meetingsShadow negotiationsBoard presentations
ContributionPrepare analysis for exec reviewPresent technical sectionPresent strategy recommendation
OwnershipLead internal projectLead cross-functional initiativeLead external negotiation

Start low-risk observation. Graduate to medium-risk contribution. Eventually high-risk ownership.

Tools you need:

Before exposing someone to a high-stakes situation, brief them:

  • What to observe
  • What questions to think about
  • What they’ll learn from this

After, debrief:

  • What did you notice?
  • What surprised you?
  • What would you do differently?

Exposure without reflection is just attendance. Reflection turns experience into learning.

Phase 2: Challenge (Months 7-12)

What it is:

Stretch assignments with support.

Not sink-or-swim. Swim-with-a-lifeguard-nearby.

How it works:

70-20-10 development model:

  • 70% learning from challenging assignments
  • 20% learning from others (coaching, mentoring, feedback)
  • 10% learning from formal training

Most development happens through doing hard things. With coaching to process what’s happening.

Real example:

First negotiation I mentioned earlier. €2.3M supplier negotiation.

I didn’t just throw her in. We prepared:

Week 1: She shadowed me in a negotiation. Observed. Took notes.

Week 2: She led strategy development. I coached. We role-played.

Week 3: She led the negotiation. I was available by phone. Didn’t intervene.

Week 4: We debriefed. What worked. What didn’t. What she’d do differently.

She failed on three things. Succeeded on five. Net outcome: strong.

But the learning? That’s what mattered.

Challenge Readiness Assessment:

Before giving someone a stretch assignment, assess:

FactorReadyNot Ready
Technical foundationKnows the domain well enough to learn leadershipStill learning basics
Self-awarenessRecognizes gaps, asks for helpDoesn’t know what they don’t know
ResilienceCan handle setback without breakingBrittle under pressure
CoachabilityTakes feedback, adjusts quicklyDefensive when challenged
Intrinsic motivationWants to grow, not just advanceJust wants promotion

Need at least 4 of 5 “Ready” signals before giving stretch assignment.

The support structure:

Challenge without support is cruelty.

Before the assignment:

  • Clear success criteria
  • Resources they’ll need
  • Who to go to for help
  • Decision rights they have

During the assignment:

  • Regular check-ins (weekly)
  • Available for urgent questions
  • Let them struggle, don’t rescue immediately

After the assignment:

  • Debrief what they learned
  • Celebrate what worked
  • Analyze what didn’t
  • Plan next challenge

Phase 3: Reflection (Ongoing)

What it is:

Guided processing of leadership experiences.

Experience doesn’t automatically become learning. Reflection converts experience into insight.

How it works:

Structured debrief conversations after significant events.

Not “how did it go?” But specific questions that force deeper thinking.

Real example:

After that junior analyst observed executive meetings for three months, I asked:

“You’ve seen six executive decisions now. What pattern do you notice about which proposals get approved versus which get delayed?”

She thought. Then said:

“The ones that get approved address the CEO’s stated priorities explicitly. The ones that get delayed might be good ideas, but they don’t connect to what leadership is already focused on.”

Perfect. She’d discovered strategic alignment through observation and reflection.

I didn’t teach her that. I created conditions for her to learn it.

Reflection Question Framework:

After a challenging project:

  • What did you expect to happen? What actually happened?
  • Where did your plan work? Where did it fail?
  • What would you do differently next time?
  • What surprised you about how people responded?
  • What did you learn about yourself as a leader?

After observing leadership:

  • What did you notice about how decisions got made?
  • What made the difference between proposals that succeeded and those that failed?
  • What leadership behaviors were effective? Ineffective?
  • What would you have done differently?

After receiving feedback:

  • What feedback did you agree with immediately?
  • What feedback surprised you?
  • What patterns are you seeing across multiple people’s feedback?
  • What one thing will you work on changing?

The reflection cadence:

Weekly: Quick check-ins on current challenges

Monthly: Deeper reflection on progress and patterns

Quarterly: Assessment of development trajectory

Reflection takes 30 minutes. The learning lasts forever.

Phase 4: Feedback (Continuous)

What it is:

Specific, actionable leadership feedback that actually helps people improve.

Not annual performance reviews. Continuous, in-the-moment coaching.

How it works:

SBI Model: Situation-Behavior-Impact

Situation: When this specific thing happened…

Behavior: Here’s what you did…

Impact: Here’s the effect it had…

Specific. Observable. Focused on behavior, not character.

Real example:

Executive presence feedback for that same analyst:

Wrong: “You need more executive presence.”

Vague. Unhelpful. She doesn’t know what to change.

Right: “In yesterday’s exec meeting (Situation), when the CFO challenged your assumption, you immediately started defending your analysis and talking faster (Behavior). That made you seem defensive rather than confident. The CFO stopped engaging (Impact). Next time, try pausing, acknowledging the question, then responding calmly. That signals confidence.”

Specific. Actionable. She knows exactly what to change.

Feedback Scripts and Templates:

Positive Reinforcement:

“In [situation], when you [behavior], it resulted in [positive impact]. That’s exactly the kind of [leadership quality] we need. Keep doing that.”

Example: “In yesterday’s supplier meeting, when they pushed back on terms, you stayed calm and asked clarifying questions instead of getting defensive. That kept the conversation productive and we reached agreement. That’s exactly the kind of composure needed in tough negotiations. Keep doing that.”

Developmental Feedback:

“In [situation], when you [behavior], it resulted in [negative impact]. Here’s what I suggest instead: [specific alternative]. Let’s practice this before your next [opportunity].”

Example: “In yesterday’s presentation, when you were asked about timeline, you said ‘I’m not sure, I’ll check.’ That undermined your credibility. Here’s what I suggest instead: ‘The current estimate is X weeks, but I’ll verify the dependencies and confirm by end of day.’ Gives them an answer while buying time to be precise. Let’s practice this before your next exec presentation.”

The feedback timing:

Best feedback: Within 24 hours of the behavior.

Good feedback: Within a week.

Useless feedback: Annual performance review six months later.

If you wait, they’ve already moved on. The behavior is disconnected from the feedback. Learning doesn’t happen.

Give feedback when it’s fresh. When they can immediately apply it.

Phase 5: Autonomy (Year 2+)

What it is:

Graduated independence with a safety net.

Not abandonment. Strategic delegation of real decision rights.

How it works:

You stop being involved in execution. You stay involved in strategy and development.

They own outcomes. You provide context and coaching.

Real example:

After two years developing that analyst, I gave her full ownership of a category strategy.

She owned:

  • Supplier selection decisions
  • Contract negotiations
  • Budget allocation
  • Team coordination

I was available for:

  • Strategic guidance
  • Political navigation
  • Crisis support
  • Career coaching

She ran it. I coached from the sidelines.

First year, she made three significant mistakes. Each one we debriefed, learned from, adjusted.

Second year, she made one mistake.

Third year, she was teaching others how to run category strategies.

Autonomy Readiness Checklist:

Ready for autonomy when they demonstrate:

  • Technical mastery: Knows the domain deeply
  • Strategic thinking: Sees beyond immediate tasks to broader impact
  • Stakeholder management: Builds relationships and navigates politics effectively
  • Decision quality: Makes sound judgments with incomplete information
  • Learning orientation: Seeks feedback, reflects on mistakes, adjusts quickly
  • Resilience: Handles setbacks without falling apart
  • Communication: Articulates thinking clearly up, down, and across
  • Judgment: Knows when to escalate and when to handle independently

Need 7 of 8 for full autonomy. 5-6 for partial autonomy with closer oversight.

The delegation conversation:

“Here’s what you now own: [scope]

Here’s the decision authority you have: [specific rights]

Here’s where I’m still involved: [strategic, not tactical]

Here’s how we’ll stay connected: [cadence]

Here’s how I’ll support you: [availability]

Here’s what success looks like: [outcomes]

Questions?”

Clear boundaries. Clear expectations. Clear support.

Then let go.

The Development Conversation Framework

Leadership development doesn’t happen in formal reviews. It happens in regular, meaningful conversations.

The quarterly development conversation:

Not performance review. Development discussion.

The structure:

1. Reflection on progress (15 minutes)

“What are you most proud of from the last quarter?”

“What was harder than expected?”

“What did you learn about yourself as a leader?”

Let them talk. Listen more than you speak.

2. Feedback exchange (15 minutes)

“Here’s what I’ve observed…” (Use SBI model)

“What feedback do you have for me on how I can better support your development?”

Two-way. Not just you evaluating them.

3. Development priorities (20 minutes)

“Based on where you want to go, what are the 2-3 capabilities you most need to develop?”

“What opportunities could help you build those?”

“What support do you need from me?”

Let them drive. You facilitate.

4. Goal setting (10 minutes)

“Let’s define specific development goals for next quarter.”

Make them SMART:

  • Specific: “Lead cross-functional project” not “improve leadership”
  • Measurable: “Present to exec team twice” not “get more visibility”
  • Achievable: Stretch but realistic
  • Relevant: Aligned to their career trajectory
  • Time-bound: Specific timeline

Individual Development Plan Template:

Development GoalTarget CapabilityLearning ActivitiesSuccess MeasuresSupport NeededTimeline
Lead first supplier negotiationStrategic negotiationShadow 2 negotiations, role-play prep, lead €500K negotiationClose deal within 10% of target, positive supplier feedbackWeekly coaching sessions, backup support during negotiationQ2 2026
Build executive presenceExecutive communicationPresent at 2 exec meetings, complete presentation course, get feedback from 3 execsPositive feedback from execs, no nervous tells, clear messagingPresentation coaching, exec meeting accessQ1-Q2 2026
Develop strategic thinkingSystems thinkingLead category strategy refresh, read 2 strategy books, discuss with mentor monthlyStrategy approval from leadership, identification of 3 non-obvious opportunitiesStrategic planning templates, monthly strategy discussionsQ1-Q3 2026

Tracking progress without micromanaging:

Monthly check-in (30 minutes):

  • Progress on development goals
  • Obstacles encountered
  • Support needed
  • Adjustments to plan

You’re not tracking tasks. You’re enabling growth.

Question frameworks that unlock insight:

Instead of: “How’s it going?”

Ask: “What’s the hardest decision you’ve faced this month? Walk me through your thinking.”

Instead of: “Any issues?”

Ask: “Where are you stuck? What would unstick you?”

Instead of: “You should…”

Ask: “What have you considered? What’s holding you back from that approach?”

Questions that make them think develop capability. Answers you provide create dependency.

Common Mistakes That Derail Development

Mistake 1: Delegating Tasks, Not Leadership Opportunities

The trap:

You delegate execution. Not decision-making.

“Here’s what I need you to do” vs. “Here’s the outcome we need, how would you approach it?”

One creates order-takers. The other creates leaders.

The fix:

Delegate outcomes, not tasks. Let them figure out the how.

Mistake 2: Rescuing Too Quickly When They Struggle

The trap:

They’re struggling. You jump in. Fix it. They never learn.

Your job isn’t preventing failure. It’s ensuring failure becomes learning.

The fix:

Let them struggle longer than feels comfortable. Ask “What have you tried?” before offering solutions.

Rescue only when:

  • Actual crisis (not just discomfort)
  • Risk to customer/company
  • They’ve exhausted their own problem-solving

Otherwise, coach through it. Don’t solve for them.

Mistake 3: Only Developing People Who Remind You of Yourself

The trap:

You unconsciously invest in people who think like you, look like you, have similar backgrounds.

You miss talent that’s different from you.

The fix:

Deliberately develop people who are nothing like you. Different backgrounds. Different strengths. Different styles.

Diversity of thought makes better leaders. Homogeneity makes weaker teams.

Mistake 4: Not Investing Time Because They Might Leave

The trap:

“Why develop them if they’ll just leave for another company?”

This is backwards thinking.

The fix:

Better question: “What happens if we don’t develop them and they stay?”

You get stuck with people who can’t grow. Who become dead weight. Who block advancement for others.

Develop them. If they stay, you have great leaders. If they leave, you have a reputation for building talent and stronger people want to work for you.

Either way, you win.

Mistake 5: Confusing Subject Matter Expertise with Leadership Potential

The trap:

Best engineer becomes engineering manager. Best analyst becomes team lead.

Technical excellence doesn’t predict leadership capability.

The fix:

Assess leadership potential separately from technical skill:

  • Do they influence without authority?
  • Do they make others better?
  • Do they think strategically, not just tactically?
  • Do they take ownership beyond their role?
  • Do they develop others?

Technical mastery is necessary. Not sufficient.

Your job isn’t managing work.

It’s building people who can do work you can’t imagine yet.

Tasks get done today. Leaders compound for decades.

That analyst I developed? She’s now developing leaders who are developing leaders.

That’s three generations of impact from one investment.

That’s legacy.

Start with one person. Give them exposure. Challenge them. Reflect with them. Give feedback. Grant autonomy.

Repeat.

In five years, you’ll have built something that outlasts you.

That’s the work.

The link has been copied!